google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
More

    Lawsuit Accuses Amazon of Secretly Tracking Consumers Through Cellphones

    Amazon.com was sued on Wednesday by consumers who accused the retailing giant of secretly tracking their movements through their cellphones, and selling data it collects.

    According to a proposed class action in San Francisco federal court, Amazon obtained “backdoor access” to consumers’ phones by providing tens of thousands of app developers with code known as Amazon Ads SDK to be embedded in their apps.

    This allegedly enabled Amazon to collect an enormous amount of timestamped geolocation data about where consumers live, work, shop and visit, revealing sensitive information such as religious affiliations, sexual orientations and health concerns.

    “Amazon has effectively fingerprinted consumers and has correlated a vast amount of personal information about them entirely without consumers’ knowledge and consent,” the complaint said.

    The complaint was filed by Felix Kolotinsky of San Mateo, California, who said Amazon collected his personal information through the “Speedtest by Ookla” app on his phone.

    He said Amazon’s conduct violated California’s penal law and a state law against unauthorized computer access, and seeks unspecified damages for millions of Californians.

    Amazon, based in Seattle, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for the plaintiff did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.

    Individuals and regulators are increasingly complaining that companies are trying to profit from information gathered without consent from cellphones.

    On Jan. 13, the state of Texas sued Allstate for allegedly tracking drivers through cellphones, using the data to raise premiums or deny coverage, and selling the data to other insurers.

    Allstate said its data collection fully complies with all laws and regulations. At least eight similar private lawsuits against Allstate have been subsequently filed.

    The case is Kolotinsky v Amazon.com Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 25-00931.

    Topics
    Lawsuits

    Interested in Distracted Driving?

    Get automatic alerts for this topic.



    Source link

    Recent Articles

    First OMO purchase auction under RBI’s latest liquidity infusion measures gets huge response from banks

    The first Open Market Operation (OMO) purchase auction conducted by RBI on Thursday as part of its latest liquidity infusion measures saw a...

    What Is a Cash-In Refinance? Lower Your Loan Balance and Your Mortgage Rate

    If you’re currently the proud owner of a mortgage, you’ve undoubtedly heard of a cash-out refinance, one that allows you to tap into...

    A Quick TikTok Ban Update And The State Of Social Media

    Podcast: Download (Duration: 43:08 — 49.6MB)Today, Toni and I are talking about the TikTok ban and what’s really going on with...

    2:00PM Water Cooler 1/30/2025 | naked capitalism

    Bird Song of the Day Brown Thrasher, Stipson Island Rd., Cape May, New Jersey, United States/ * * * In Case You...

    Related Stories

    Leave A Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox

    google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
    google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0