google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
More
    More

      Wage growth since 1979 has not been stagnant, but it has definitely been suppressed


      Wage growth since 1979 has not been stagnant, but it has definitely been suppressed

      We recently released our annual report assessing wage growth in the U.S. economy. We highlighted that strong and broadly shared wage growth since 2019 contrasted sharply with much slower and unequal rates of growth before that year. This report’s release is also a good time to be explicit about a judgement we’ve made in recent years at EPI to stop referring to the entire post-1979 period as one of “wage stagnation.”

      The reason for this change is straightforward: Many interpret “stagnation” to mean “literally zero growth,” and cumulative wage growth for typical workers since 1979 has definitely cleared the absurdly low bar of zero.

      To be clear, relative to any reasonable measure of the economy’s potential to deliver broadly shared wage growth or relative to previous historical periods, the post-1979 period has been terrible for typical workers.

      In a follow-up post we’ll provide a bit more detail supporting our contention that typical workers’ wage growth has been unforgivably slow relative to reasonable benchmarks. One short reason is that all the wage growth since 1979 happened in just two episodes when the unemployment rate was allowed to stay low for extended periods (the late 1990s and post-2014—with wage growth really accelerating in the past five years of this period for lower-wage workers). Growth in the other two-thirds of years in this post-1979 epoch really has been essentially stagnant. But these two episodes happened and were obviously good for workers and good for knowing that tight labor markets should be a key target of policymakers.

      Dropping “wage stagnation” as a descriptive term for the full post-1979 period doesn’t mean we think the wage problem for American workers has been solved. Wage growth in the post-1979 period has been slow and unequal, largely as a result of intentional policy decisions. This policy-induced wage suppression has stifled growth in living standards and generated inequality. The last five years saw rapid and welcome progress reversing some of these trends—but it will take a long time to heal the previous damage, even if the post-2019 momentum can be sustained, which looks very unlikely at the moment.





      Source link

      Recent Articles

      Affordable Warm States With Fast-Rising Home Values

      For many young adults, the idea of settling down in a sunny, coastal city feels like the ultimate goal. But with home prices...

      Why I Didn’t Let My 2-Year-Old Buy a Toy at Target

      Last Thursday, Kaitlynn (our 17-year-old) took Micah (our 2-year-old) with her to Target. He was so excited to be going on a little...

      How to Clean Old Kitchen Cabinets: A Step-by-Step Guide

      Let’s face it: kitchen cabinets see things. Splattered spaghetti sauce, greasy fingerprints, the mysterious sticky goo you pretend not to notice, and all...

      Not necessary to activate Countercyclical Capital Buffer for banks at this point in time: RBI

      The framework envisages credit-to-GDP gap as the main indicator, which may be used in conjunction with other supplementary indicators. | Photo Credit: FRANCIS MASCARENHAS The Reserve...

      Related Stories

      Leave A Reply

      Please enter your comment!
      Please enter your name here

      Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox

      google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
      google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0