google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
More

    Trump Has No Comparative Advantage at Understanding Trade


    Here’s a letter to a new visitor to the Cafe:

    Mr. M__:

    You write that “economists’ textbook fiction for validating free trade is defeated by the facts and logic of President Trump when, talking to the Davos group, he said about Canada that ‘we don’t need them to make our cars, we make a lot of them, we don’t need their lumber because we have our own forests…. We don’t need their oil and gas, we have more than anybody.’”

    With respect, you – and Mr. Trump – could not be more mistaken. In the early 19th century economists identified the principle of comparative advantage, which shows that mere physical ability to produce something is economically irrelevant. What is relevant is the cost of producing particular goods and services yourself relative to the cost of acquiring those goods and services from someone else.

    For example, you might have, as many Americans do, a large enough backyard to grow your own tomatoes. But the cost to you of doing so – in terms of your time, as well as of alternative uses of your yard – is higher than is the cost to you of buying tomatoes from others and using your backyard and time as you actually use them. Were you to grow your own tomatoes simply because you have the capacity to do so, you’d lose the capacity to produce other things – things that you produce at lower cost than do other people. You can’t grow your own tomatoes without diverting your time and backyard space away from other uses. You and those with whom you trade, therefore, both gain when each of you specializes at producing what you produce best and buying the rest of what you want to consume from others, using the income you earn from selling the outputs that you produce.

    If Mr. Trump really believes what he told the Davos crowd, not only would he prevent us Americans from trading with foreigners, he’d also personally cook his own meals, drive and wash his own automobiles, cut his own hair, clean his own toilets, and grow his own tomatoes. He has the capacity to do each of these (and other) tasks for himself. Yet I’m sure that he does none of these things for himself. And despite his mistaken economics, he in fact would be made worse off if you or I coerced him to perform all of these tasks himself on the grounds that he has the capacity to do so.

    Sincerely,
    Donald J. Boudreaux
    Professor of Economics
    and
    Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center
    George Mason University
    Fairfax, VA 22030





    Source link

    Recent Articles

    The Case For Open-Ended Venture Capital Funds Over Closed Ones

    One adjustment I'm making to my net worth asset allocation is reducing exposure to closed-end venture capital funds while increasing allocation to open-ended...

    At The Money: Jeff Hirsch on Presidential Investing Cycles

         At The Money: Jeff Hirsch on Presidential Investing Cycles. (January 25, 2025) What does history inform us about how newly elected presidents impact the...

    Ziggma Review: Investment Portfolio Tracking

    One of the most important things you’ll need to do as an investor is to keep track of your portfolio. From time to...

    Banks are counting on this one segment to drive loan growth

    After the lending doldrums of recent years, bank executives hope that a business-friendly environment under the Trump administration...

    Alphabet’s Waymo to Test Autonomous Driving Technology in New Cities

    Alphabet’s self-driving unit Waymo announced on Wednesday it plans to expand testing of its autonomous...

    Related Stories

    Leave A Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox

    google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
    google.com, pub-6007374308804254, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0